From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Richard Kahn Subject: Re: Update on tower Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 17:59:47 +0000 coverage for what. ? i can lay dediecatedd line if only for the house.. im unclear . lets discuss On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Richard Kahn Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. Begin fonvarded message: From: Terrence Rabsatt c Subject: Re: Update on tower Date: June 9, 2014 at 10:52:24AM EDT To: Darren Indyke Cc: Jeanne Brennan Richard Kahn > >, Cecile deJongh wrote: Good day, Hope all is well. I wanted to get all info before relaying anything to you. As it stands we can put the tower at any height we want. DW only recommends the best possible signal path and then gets it approved from FCC. They however relayed to me that if I choose not to install where recommend, and I get issues with signal integrity it voids my warranty. I gave them the new coordinates and the lowest we can go at either location is 30ft. I will be charged to go back to FCC for a new license at this height. So I would like for us to finalize the location so we can do this just once. Please be advised that this changes the layout on LSJ. After going over the path study and doing another walk through with Jermaine. I have decided that the best way to cover the dead spots is to turn five palms and the Kit House into a link and install 4 other bridges at those locations. This gives us full coverage even at the lower height or changed tower location. Extra cost adjustment would be about (4) AP-CPEs @ $3,996.00, (4) 802.11 a/n bridges @ $2,516.00, I will however waive the extra labor cost which brings your total to $26,048.00 Also do we have a decision on weather or not we are servicing customers or just ourselves. Regards, Terrence Rabsatt On Jun 6, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Darren Indyke c wrote: EFTA00991141