From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Bill Gates Subject: Re: Re: Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:23:38 +0000 there is both the amounts and the timing, ex , Im 80, and will give 20 percent of my daf as i see fit, and upon my death , you decide which silos maybe from a general silo feeder fund, or I can choose from a menu of silos and in addition can decide whether it should be anonymous or have my name on the gift. I have time over the weekend to discuss if you like On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Bill Gates c > wrote: Your idea of getting donor input on what silos we should add is a good one. We can tell them we are open minded to adding a few and find out from them what they think is missing. This part of the discussion goes along with the piece where we are telling them how much giving needs to go to the silos. Let's take a case where someone puts $1B into their DAF. If they had put that into a foundation they would be paying out $50M per year. If 70% of their giving was going to the silos it would be $35M per year. In return for us letting them use the silos do we ask that they pay into them at least $100M in the first five years? We don't want to have no requirement at all. The requirement could be total giving with a minimum percent for the silos or it could just be an amount that needs to go to the silos. From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 5:48 AM To: Bill Gates Subject: Re: couldn't agree more. no agressive strategies, would be vastly counterproductive. I would wait on creating new silos until you had input from a donor group, so they feel part of the decision process. just setting it up EFTA00986219