From: "Farkas, Andrew L." < 1=1=> To: " <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Fw: Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:29:01 +0000 How would you like to see us proceed from here? If it devolved due to crony-ism, it will just turn into a big public lawsuit which we will have to bring on our behalves and on behalf of the lender, bppr, for the improper and unlawful taking of collateral etc. We will bring it in the second circuit in nyc and it will be brought against the govt, the czm commission and its members individually. That will be very expensive for them to defend as they will each have to retain counsel in nyc and they will have to come to nyc, not infrequently, for hearings and depositions. I am not remotely put off by the prospect. In fact given their history I actually expect it. But if you have better ideas let's hear them! Original Message From: Mukamal, Thomas [mailto Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 09:53 PM To: Farkas, Andrew L. Cc: Garrison, Frank Subject: Re: Fw: I sent Cecile the entire record today at her request. I think the issues should be separated addressed S follows (I) we offered a compromise on his czm application which would allow him to increase his water up to a point without impacting our business. He has rejected that compromise several times. He should take it - this compromise has been presented to him by Casner and again in from of the czm commission. Hoffman knows exactly what the compromise details are. (2) assuming we have an agreeable compromise under (1) we can open a dialogue on the management of the dock in a long term basis that is rational on the economics for him and for us - along the lines with what was proposed by Hoffman below which is what I proposed to him last summer - we can put in some more cash $25 k (ish) to fix up the dock and extend the agreement at a much lower rent. Yes, cutting off the sewage was a good move. Took a month to make that happen. We would allow his sewage to pass through AYH. Not sure