From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Michael Wolff Subject: Re: Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:10:00 +0000 yes but the document makes all the difference On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Michael Wolff < wrote: You saw this? http:/Avww.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/03/woody-allen-dylan-farrow-abuse-allegations On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote: it could be titled. why kristof should apologize to woody. He let an admittedly disclosed family friend hijack his column and reputaiton , regurgitating 20 year old allegation that the documents, that were available to him . show were judged false AT THE TIME. experts hired , interviews taken . came to the conclusion for now everyone to read that , dylans statements were fantasy. Kristof did a disservice to those whose victim status is beyond question. deciding instead to give a voice to someone whose allegations when she was 7 years old were at the time not only suspect , but reviewed and found wanting. On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Michael Wolff < wrote: Woody and Soon-Yi came to dinner this week and seemed grateful for the piece I wrote about them. I've been reluctant though to do more--that is, not sure they want more. What do you think? Is the document something they want in circulation? I can do a column for Monday morning that incorporates it. And by the way, thanks for introducing us. They both are terrific. The injustice and illogic of all this is infuriating. Are you in Paris? On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote: it has not been widely disseminated , but should put an end to the dylan sympathy On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Michael Wolff < > wrote: see you then On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Jeffrey Epstein le ts‘ [email protected]> wrote: yes On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Michael Wolff I can now do 4:00, if that works better. wrote: On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Jeffrey Epst