From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Subject: Re: flying Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 02:25:50 +0000 your statistics seems no better than your other arguments.. they are misleading and it is what is called a long tail.. you compared accidents and incidents. not similar. , incapacitation is another fake term. . if larry had diarrhea , he woudl not be incapacitated„ he would however by a sick pilot. . compare accidents involving low hour pilots and high hour pilots. , more relevant. . , compare accidents with a low hour co pilot to a high hour co pilot, you might be right , but provide real nmbers. On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:44 PM, > wrote: Ok, fair point. Disagree would have been a better word. Since it is 'the only real concern', I thought you would be interested to know that the probability of pilot incapacitation leading to an accident during a 6hour flight is literally one in a million. ( 0.000000966, based on 5 years of general aviation accident data ) The probability of the two pilots dealing with some of the things I described earlier is close to one in one ;-) From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: gcl Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 6:36 PM Subject: Re: flying I resent you saying there is no benefit to have me fly. It is actually to your advantage and the safety of the flight. FYI in the future if you would like to put forth a position that you feel warrants closer inspection, telling me, or anyone else that you "resent" what is suggested, both weakens your position , smacks of girliness. and only detracts from any solid ground that your argument needs for support On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:29 PM, wrote: Yes, if Larry was incapacitated, you would be better off with Dave or Darren. No argument there. Thanks but I have no intentions of moving as I told you I need to be based in NYC. From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 5:23 PM Subject: Re: flying lam aware of the robots..