From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: jessica banks <1 Subject: Re: thanks again Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:14:16 +0000 yes to crouch On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:48 PM, jessica banks <1 um, the Queen? > wrote: it seems a bit to me that, given the malleability of the majority, most people who would visit such a site will be the ones looking for your guilt (including reporters). The site will most likely just get consumed by the visceral sentiment that sent them searching, adding more fuel to their lackluster fires. Worse yet, people could just mock you... i reallllllly think less is more here. is it your ego suffering or some other suffering (financial, friends, etc.) that wants the record straightened? you seemed to feel you weren't suffering. and i don't think that your friends need a site. so, the question would be "who is your audience?" is it you? my thoughts about the billionaires spending actually might parley to your issue though. so we should talk. regardless, i do know the man for such a job...he is an extremely close friend and highly prized for doing web stuff (though he doesn't specialize in "rebranding," so to speak, he does a great job at working with those who do). having said that - there are actual firms that you can hire to do such a thing - though that could have the same effect as clinton getting trained out of his head-nodding and eye-winking microexpression by experts in lie detection - a lesson clinton refused for fear any association, should it get out, would be incriminating. not that there would be any association b/w you and clinton, of course. of course. now...what about john crouch? should i tell him you are still interested. On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote: also think about who coulld set up a web site for me devoted to setting the record straight On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:18 AM, jessica banks < > wrote: ...mostly for spending QT with me the other day.