From: "Gmax" To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:50:07 +0000 Oh - well make sure he knows you only need one piece of that puzzle - either start or finish date...both of course would be good. according to her she was a spa attendant (cleaner) however she was dressed in full spa outfit like all the girls working there and I actually think she was behind the counter when I met her ---- Original Message --- From: Jeffrey Epstein [email protected]> To: Gmax Sent: Tue Mar 22 08:44:51 2011 Subject: Re: nick hates donald On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:33 AM, GMAX < > wrote: I thought you said not to involve Donald- anyway so now the die is case — you now have to get her employment record — It will either show she started work in 1999 or 2000 as she was full time there and I believe you cannot be a minor and work MI time anywhere so she had to be at least 16 to be in full time employment. Perhaps start that way — that alone would kill her allegation that she was 15 — as I said you cant work full time anywhere at that age..either that or she gave fake ID to which is also possible..however — lets see if you get the info..and please confirm the labour law On 3/22/11 8:25 AM, "1 Jep" <[email protected]> wrote: ------- Forwarded message --- From: Nicholas L.Ribis • Date: Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:22 AM Subject: Re: To: [email protected] Call u in AM I will check From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:jeevacation©gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 08:19 AM To: Nicholas L.Ribis Subject: nick, the girl in the new papers that has made all this trouble said she worked at when she was 15. in 98„ / I virtualy positve that is a lie. it was when she was 17, in 2000. He name is . who would i go to verify, I dont' know how Donald would respond„? EFTA00907555