From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: marital trust Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 08:17:32 +0000 max is not misunderstanding the documents. he is using the technical points of documments as the required necessaities of the estate plan and igonring the clear intentions of both parties. As you are well aware. the money in the trust , is a result of my work. I was surprised tto read that you thought I should have professional advice BEFORE I marrriedl. If you believe that somehow, because of the techinical details. that the money in the trust is really yours and not mine. lets discuss it. I would like you to agree to my choice of trustee . When richard kahn said the money in the trust was all mine, he referred to it as the money as a result of my work. . I find it distrubing that you woudl hold my own money hostage. for goals that are misplaced. . Max;s argument that he is protecting me from myself and keeping his eye on my financial future. is silly, especailly given the fact that he required me to use money from my IRA. account. taxed twice as a result of his refusal to distribute money to me to pay my taxes. I woudl like max to resign and I ask that you allow me to appoint who I like. If you are worred about your inheritance. suggest what portion of the trust you believe to be yours by right. thx On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 3:27 AM, Noam Chomsky < > wrote: Jeffrey: Below a letter that I plan to send to the three children about the marital trust. Is it OK? Anything wrong or missing? Noam You wrote me a letter to which I haven't yet sent a response. I'll respond to the points you raise, which are based on serious misunderstanding and information that is quite wrong. That should be clarified. But I'm writing now about something else. I don't know whether Max has informed you about our recent correspondence about his trusteeship of the marital trust, but whether or not he did, I'd like to tell you the facts of the matter