From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Subject: Re: you Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:35:44 +0000 I know so link about how you think about me that I wouldn't dare make any bold suggestions. I asked what you want .. this is what you say, this is after you ask for clear comnummic-aion On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:30 AM, > wrote: Fine. I will be the first one again to speak directly. but I do hope you can respond candidly as well. My feelings for you have not changed. I thought they would but if it's possible. l only love you more now because I can see what had to you put up with. With that said, I have no expectations of a Pretty Woman style happy ending. Thinking about 'what I want' has proven to be counterproductive and my decisions based on those desires arc usually wrong. l know so little about how you think about me that I wouldn't dare make any bold suggestions. My dreams have not changed very much but my expectations of them coming true have. I've described everything else in my last long email. Dan Gilbert talks about how students in his test group unknowingly set themselves up for failure when they select to have the freedom to change their minds about which photograph to keep from their school project... I'd like you to take that freedom away from me. I'd like you to invite me in or lock the door. I am only referring to our romantic involvement. I truly want you to be happy so although I'd like you to play a bigger role in my life. I'll take it in any capacity I can get. l can simply be one of your ex-girlfriends. platonic friend, or your matchmaker.. lam comfortable staying within my box, but YOU need to check one in ink so we can get past this awkwardness. PS: This is the talk I am referring to : If you speak with Dan or know the answer yourself, here is my other question - If divorce was not an option, would people not only tolerate their partners but actually BE happier in their marriages? Is that how arranged marriage works? Dah