From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Subject: Re: Re: Re: Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:03:02 +0000 we see things differently„ if you were a mistress, you would have had other duties.. you were helpful, as a friend.. very helpful,,, On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:23 AM, > wrote: I truly believe being of service to others is the key to a life well lived. My massive contention in all of this is that I showed up for you ( bar the furniture and Paris which was really my misinterpretation based on lack of clarity as to what you wanted/needed, I was responsible, well organized and committed. So, the hard part is that I really believed i was doing a good job for you, and that already is a term riddled with complication because if you view it as society would ( not as you would ) I wasn't just doing a job for you we were intimate together these last months. which moreover puts me in the category of mistress, but if i were a mistress alone, a mistress to a man of your calibre, the exchange of equivalent value between you and I ( since we're viewing it from the viewpoint of society ) was more than fair, which makes the torture of what i DON'T do for you , really difficult to comprehend and painful because its a sense of i give, i give and its never enough! And it only gets confusing because there is always such a tundra of intensity and thus possibility between us all the time. On Oct 31, 2010, at 8:54 AM, Jeevacation wrote: Just more talk . Exactly the opposite of what is needed . Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Oct 31, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Why? Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device wrote: From: Jeevacation [email protected]> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:24:28 -0400 To: Subject: Re: Re: No Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Oct 31, 2010, at 8:23 AM, wrote: EFTA00897827