From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Subject: Re: Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 01:30:32 +0000 look for statements that reflect you actually doing something as opposed to complaining about my responding to you. i.e. I read the book on low cholestoerl and cooked something, i cooked something from the book you spent time reviewing. i learned , I orgainzed,for you I bought for you brought for you or made for you . i helped , i assisted, i did what you asked, ( russain refloxolgist , had you asked i would have said no interest whatsoever, ) , I surprised you, a gave you. I like her, she was nice, she was helpful, you are luckym you will find many how could you say that , why did she, how could she, why did you, i dont like , On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:19 PM, > wrote: Kruger and Magniani. And you were the one who told me they call you after i see them and discuss it with you. I know you don't seek it out but because you pay for it and give them lots of business, they either feel obligated or see an opportunity to get something else, and they call. I will re-read my emails tonight so i can understand what you are talking about. From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: <I Sent Mon, December 7, 2009 7:55:48 PM Subject: Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:52 PM, < wrote: Maybe not but all the doctors you pay directly keep you well informed about my 'treatments' anyway and with this one I don't feel comfortable in that situation. She believes I pay for myself with money you have given me I was suggesting that you wrote ( refer) that "all the doctors keep me informed.." once again total fabrication based on nothing but your misplaced suspicion. I have never once invaded your privacy „ not once. this is the reason it is difficult for me to listen to ou or in your words be open . open for you means accuse me of another petty transgression. *********************************************************** The information contained in this communication is