From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:35:13 +0000 if you leave that part to me„ is there real protection that can be structured short of 6002, and is that for only under oath fre 410 would not eliminate other jurisdictional risk, or would it. On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Martin Weinberg < wrote: By prior agreement that any discussions are subject to FRE 410 - but the predicate problem is whether, why, and under what conditions he would agree to meet with you - Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, M., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. Original message from Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>: thanks„ I would like to meet with Jeff SLoman.. I know you do not like the idea.. Is there a way, that eliminates my risk„ fre410 for example. ******************************************* **************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA00884416