From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Cecile de Jongh Subject: Re: confidential Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:22:57 +0000 ok„ re gennaine, we need the most competent people, he has not really kept up .. M, and curtis have both complained. i don't mind replacing himm, and i really don't like the settlement issue„ he owed us full disclosure On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Cecile de Jongh > wrote: Thanks - sending again to John. Vincent is off island and Gov't closed for Easter weekend until Tuesday (can you believe it). John will email to Vincent. From: Jeffrey Epstein .Ceevacation gmail.com> To: Cecile de Jongh c Sent Thursday, April 9, 2009 9:08:01 AM Subject Re: confidential Cecil//+ I will talk to the attorney today.. here is the attachment Chris lane is the man in charge of the interstate compact in Floridan. The interstate compact dictates that Receiving states MUST now take probationers . But it is the sending states discretion on whether or not to apply. That is the norm ,. As the receiving state is responsible for the cost of supervision, In the past states had previously turned down transferees. The interstate compact does not now allow the state to turn down transfers. Normally as " community control" has to be a heightened and hence, more expensive supervision,i.e. once a week reporting ( as opposed to once a month )and on weekends and holidays.) Florida usually does not ask another state to take on the added expense. As compared to the normal probation it costs more, so that in my case the VI has to agree to the same terms and conditions as the normal community control provisions that I would be subject to if I stayed. I think best that the head of the compact commission for the VI - Ms. Swan should deal with Chris Lane ( Floridas' interstate compact administrator) .. , my assistant has spoken to him previously and he thought this was accomplished with little fuss. The question that remains is where on my side do we st