From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:00:04 +0000 yes, BUT I don t think you understand how weak he really is, and for the moment you represent pain, he will try to figure out , how to avoid the pain, because he can't avoid melinda. As you make your calculus of decisions please keep in mind that your perception of the outcome of the house, and the perception of how he wouldn't every do something like this, or the idea that he would be fair with yo u re partnership structure, was distorted by how you would have behaved in the same circumstance. On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Boris Nikolic < wrote: I do feel horrible re your time! Nevertheless, you must admit that this makes an interesting challenge. Like a chess game with a lot of stake on it for me. Wish I was not part of that. THANK YOU B Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:30:37 -0400 Subject: Re: From: [email protected] To: if you are going to talk face to face , then you MUST tell him that you already told me the details , otherwise , he might tell you make sure you don't then you are screwed On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote: I agree but if he says no face to face , what will you do.. I thought that if he says no in writing you can then have a back up On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Boris Nikolic < wrote: this is great. My only worry is whether I should send him now or tell him when I see him on Monday. He is still trying to make it work with Melinda. He is having next round of negotiation with her next weekend. If all fails - then it is a negotiation for a next steps. If I send it right now it reads that I accepted that it is all over. Finally I can't put some things such as divorce in a email. If she reads, she will go extra steps to be as nasty as possible. Also I think that my chances of convincing him to talk to you are higher if I do it in person and not over EFT