From: "Martin G. Weinberg" < To: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation4gmail.eom>, <I Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 00:41:35 +0000 Importance: Normal I am thinking worst case scenario (what else do lawyers do) — in the event you were ever in a remedy hrg before j marra or in a punitive damage case with Edwards (you can better assess the odds of that occurring which I am assuming to be low but not non-existent), the quoted statements attributed to you re "minimizing' what you are alleged to have done and your feelings on NPA would be used against you. I would expect that Edwards would do whatever he could to insert the article into the CVRA case even before the remedy phase to anger J Marra (and attempt thru subpoena to pursue discovery from the reporter eg his notes of interviews with you). The reporter wants to speak with you again, in part to ask about SG, case. I think you should avoid more quotes unless they temper the earlier ones I highlighted. I will just send a list of pgs, lines, inserted thoughts re article: Pg 5 first par — reporter speaks about a 'sex slave ring" and speaks in the plural "sex slaves" suggesting more than one accusation Pg 8 1st par — reporter should clarify that the young women at your house (and later on your plane) are comely but clearly not underage Pg 20- might lead a reader to think you helped clients hide wealth which could lead someone to want to focus on their FBAR or FATCO compliance (it's a leap but I am here to raise red flags) Pg 21 — Hoffenberg mentioned — I assume from what everyone including J Sweet says he is nuts but not flattering and totally irrelevant to the story Pg 25 — quoting you on massages — your adversaries will exploit this to show a lack of remorse, minimizing the conduct etc - Pg 25-26 — don't help him with SG — he's confusing SG and HR — whatever SGs age her website said she was 18 Pg 26 — he loops back to your "description" which opens reporter up to legal pressur