From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: "Martin G. Weinberg" Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 00:03:56 +0000 can you send in a different format so redlining shows On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Martin G. Weinberg c - wrote: Until pg 25, just some red-tracked inserts that would help but nothing pivotal Starting at pg 25 some more serious issues revolving around (1) your own quoted statement that minimizes what you were alleged to have done which can be used against you if there were ever a CVRA remedy phase or ever any other legal case where your credibility and morality was at issue. The quotation is the single worst paragraph to me (particularly when it matches the reporter's later non-verbatim conclusion of your having no regret as to anything you did other than not following legal advice better) (2) Your denying everything VR says. This at least walks you toward giving her (and the Boies firm) a basis to sue for defamation (I am not an authority on NY state defamation law as to whether a public denial of a quoted allegation is a defamatory statement but it bears looking into) an escape from the settlement agreement and a basis to sue you (3) Your being quoted as saying the NPA was coercive, Kafkaesque, implicitly that it was unfair to you — this will hurt you if CVRA gets to remedy phase and J Marra is exercising any discetion (although we will principally rely on contract and constitutional law) I have inserted red-track comments. I have "over-edited" the article not knowing whether you have the relationship with the reporter to have him extract several of the more substantive and to me harmful paragraphs. I am not the person (as you've said before) to weigh in on the PR effect in NY, elsewhere, probably is quite powerful and positive (I leave that assessment to you) but from a legal perspective which is what I think you are asking the edits go from small ones (add not underage to descriptions of young