From: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation®gmail.com> To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 11:09:47 +0000 Attachments: structre-serch-entropy-july5-2012.pdf Inline-Images: jumpnew_hl-ljpg thats cheating .. Is the study of how it dances really a study of the living systen? or is merely the sensory motor display in phyiscal space. if you admit it being the latter , my dismal knowledge of language requires the expert to suggest , was the mistake a "semantic error' ? haha.. 2. the bee takes the space time vector and using poloarization and other inputs, to merely express in in other domains its result. a phenomenological trivial event. wouldnt pointing and saying" over there". be as trivial . if you do point and speak , isn't that a merging of the" two" languages . neither concatenation or distance . ?? I attach a gromov paper. his apology to the reader on page 26 , i think elegantly explains some of the new difficulties. Online image 1 On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Noam Chomsky < wrote: It's quite true that computer modelling of living systems is often misused, but it's often used quite effectively. In the case of language, what has been used effectively is the theory of computability-recursive function theory, which provides basic and appropriate tools. It's also been used effectively to study insect navigation and much else. EFTA00854924