From: Daniel Gelemter To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 14:43:04 +0000 Hi Jeffrey -- Thanks very much; we certainly appreciate the offer, but are ok on cash. Looking forward to getting the does in place! Thanks again for the offer! Dan On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:34 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: if you are short of cash im happy to fund without docs. 100k? On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Daniel Gelemter <Ma wrote: I take your point. We accept the deal on your terms if we can close right away. Best, Dan On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:05 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: silly response. Lesson 1 why risk no deal for such a small difference in a big win. ? On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Gelemter < > wrote: Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if you'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:13 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: better but too complex , for ex , 400k . first everyone gets their money back, and the split is . 50 50 untl 20 million 60 .40 up until 40. 70 30 above 50. the larger amounts in your favor of course On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Gelemter > wrote: Dear Jeffrey - Regarding ow conversation yesterday, we'd propose the following for a $1 M investment: Any sale at or above $50M, the investor gets 20% Any sale between $30M and $50M, the investor gets 22% Any sale at or below $30M, and the investors share as a percentage is calculated as .09X^2 - 4.6X + 80, where X is the sale price in millions. This will guarantee a return on the investment for sales as low as $ I .5M (which would produce a 10% return). A 54M sale would return the investor $2.5M, a WM sale would return $4.3M, etc. Would welcome your thoughts and your investment. Regards, Dan EFTA00843325