From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: David Sauvage Subject: Re: Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:30:42 +0000 you dont have to be a scientist to underatnd the concept of proof. does massage work? not a science question , but some think it does. can you prove to anyone that your intuitive abilities are repeatable. verifiable, . probably not. but is ok. with vast experience , chinese doctors can tell if someones kidneys are working properly , the eyes are a little dull and yellow, its not science but a pretty good predictor. . the other experiment you can try if you want is hold their hands. write down what you feel. , and afterwards have them choose which best describes their charcateristics. I did this with 200 girls. each one had to rate the accuracy of diagnosisi on a scale of 1-10. the results ranged from 3-10. however, the written diagnosis was exactly the same for each, no one like the results . beliveing is more fun On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:57 AM, David Sauvage < > wrote: I don't mind anything you're saying - I am definitely not a scientist, don't claim to be, and don't know much about experiments and design. I feel like it'd be good to talk it out? I say what I can do, and somebody who knows science tells me how we can test that, until we arrive at a solution that works both ways? Sent from my mobile device On Aug 16, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: I like you, I am trying to be kind, that is not science. . if you make people feel better and no one is injured , all the best to you. how about being blindfolded and guessing their name. the outcome must be verifiable, not you are shy , sometimes. angry other times . the trick of mentalists that do much better than that. they could take a strength finder test, and then you could take it with empathy for them, there are 100 questions see if you got the more than 80 percent right. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:24 AM, David Sauvage > wrote: Jeffrey, Just a