IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG v. BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, et al., Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. JUDGE: HAFELE JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO BRADLEY EDWARDS'S MOTION TO OC MPEL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to this Court's ruling in open court on September 15, 2017, hereby files his Response to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's ("Edwards") Motion to Compel as follows: In response to Edwards's "updated" Net Worth Interrogatories, Epstein asserted his Fifth Amendment Privilege to some of the Interrogatories, just as he did to Edwards's Initial Net Worth Interrogatories with which he was served in 2013. Epstein also answered the direct question regarding his net worth by offering to stipulate to a net worth of one hundred million dollars. Nevertheless, and notwithstanding that Edwards conceded that this assertion of the Fifth Amendment was legally permissible and acceptable at a hearing in 2013' on the exact issue, Edwards now claims, without any legal basis in the law, that "the objections are not well- See Transcript of hearing held before Judge Crow on Monday, September 16, 2013 on this issue, attached hereto as "Exhibit A." EFTA00808813