IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE H1- 1 EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF NO OBJECTION TO ATTORNEY PAUL CASSELL. ON BEHALF OF L.M., E.W. AND JANE DOE, OR DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS MOVING TO SEAL COURT RECORDS UNTIL THE COURT MAKES A DETERMINATION ON HOW THE DOCUMENTS SHALL BE TREATED Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") gives notice that, in light of the parties' differing views over the potentially privileged nature of the documents attached to Epstein's Appendix in Support of his Response in Opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") Second Supplement to Motion in Limine Addressing the Scope of Admissible Evidence, Epstein will not oppose Paul Cassell or Edwards filing a Motion seeking to seal the documents in accordance with the requirements of Administrative Order 2.303-0/09 until such time as the Court has made a determination on Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevant and Non-Privileged Nature of Documents, and Request for Additional Limited Discovery, Evidentiary Hearing and Appointment of Special Master. Paul Cassell, who has appeared on behalf of E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe, has requested that the documents be sealed to protect his clients' interests, however, his clients' names were redacted from the Court filing. EFTA00806712