3ADYCA July 16th, 2018 Via email: Attn: Mr. Darren K. Indyke DARREN K. INDYKE, PLLC New York, New York 10022 RE: Jeffrey Epstein and LSJE, LW v. Radvca, Inc. correspondence/ RESPONSE LETTER Dear Mr. Indyke: In response to your email, I would like to clarify that the monies you are referring to as "your client's advance to my firm", were actual payments towards invoices for rendered services produced over months of constant work requested by Mr. Epstein. To clarify further, RADYCA is indeed an internationally recognized design firm; actually, because of such recognition and reputation Mr. Epstein found us and first approached us. We never introduced ourselves as "architectural and landscape design professionals" as you state in your correspondence; landscape and local architects and civil engineers are some of the many professionals we suggested to Mr. Epstein in our "Master Concept Design Phase II" proposal as part of the consultants needed to complete the team for the entire project. Please refer to page 5 of the attached "Exhibit B". In regards to the landscape architecture consultants, we sent Mr. Epstein the resumes of four world renowned firms for his consideration ("Exhibit B.1"). We analyzed with him the strengths of each one, and he was inclined towards WATG which we engaged for the project on his behalf. On May 18th, WATG decided to withdraw from the project and resigned stating that they "had received information that negatively impaced WATG's association with the project". As of that date, RADYCA and WATG had one work meeting in person, two conference calls and had scheduled a full team visit to the island which was cancelled by Mr. Epstein a few days before the team's trip. To give you some context I would like to state the facts of our involvement up to date: Our initial proposal for PHASE I was accepted by Mr. Epstein and included "Survey & Digitalization services"; please refer to the attached "Exhibit A". The retainer for thi