Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6358 Filed 04/12/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR CHAPTER 11 BRADLEY EDWARDS'S REPLY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY FOWLER WHITE AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT, TO PERMIT DISCOVERY, TO ASSESS SANCTIONS AND COSTS, AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF Bradley J. Edwards, through counsel, hereby files this Reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition to Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief, and as grounds therefore states as follows: INTRODUCTION Jeffrey Epstein's Motion, through one misstatement after another, amounts to nothing more than his continued baseless disparagement of Mr. Edwards, and a poor attempt to deflect from his wrongdoing and avoid the pertinent issues. [DE 6351]. In 2010, a subpoena was issued to the RRA trustee that resulted in the production of 27,000 emails exchanged among lawyers who worked at the defunct RRA law firm. This Court recognized that within those documents was highly confidential and privileged emails pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse victims and the prosecution of their civil cases against Mr. Epstein. In order to protect the sanctity of those privileges, the Court ordered a special master to preside over the confidential review of such documents. Through its order, this Court also recognized the obvious concerns associated with 1 EFTA00795927