From: " To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:03:33 +0000 Importance: Normal I never suggested fees to oppenheim. Will keep pushing them. Will need your instructions soon about "who we are" to present it properly to them (and similar conservatives players in the future). Will let you know when I next meet them, prob 2nd week of Sept. This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Asia Gateway Ltd. shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. Asia Gateway Ltd. Michelin House 81 Fulham Road London SW3 6RD UK Tel: Fax: From: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Tue, 25 Au 2009 06:46:57 -0400 To: Subject: Re: the concept isnot based on fees .. if oppenheim were to engage, us, to find a solution. we could have had four seperate solutions, we would take a participation in either on, no up front fees , they can't resist , they have nothign to lose„ the other way is to have them lay out for you their biggest concerns„ if we find a way to save them money , we take a piece of the saving..s that is the best On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:22 AM, > wrote: After your legal clarity and when FL exodus is ready, i want to better understand your approach of "hire us" as used in your Oppenheim description. There could be increasingly real business in an advisory/financing solution package in Germany, Switzerland, UK. For "advisory" business with massive fees there could be Malaysia where the Minister of Finance is my friend and asked me for help/ideas. EFTA00773983