From: "Martin Weinberg" To: "Jeffery Edwards" <[email protected]> Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:53:52 +0000 Attachments: search memo3.doc See attached Major contradictions between affidavit/taped statement are at 2-9, and between affidavit/Recarey knowledge re cameras at pg 11. Problem with using tape, transcript is it will require us to disclose same according to Bob, Mike. Given that we have the conflict cemented, my default position is to ask questions about truthful statements on tape, get him to either deny or say no recall but not to use. Just wanted for you to have available to review for discussion. Martin G. Weinberg MARTIN G. WEINBERG, PC 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston. MA 02116 **************************************************************************** This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. ********************************** ********* ******* ************** ********** EFTA00762577