From: "Martin Weinberg" To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com> Cc: "Weinberg, Martin" < Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:49:47 +0000 could be - case was from perspective that a sender lost privacy once email was sent to 3d party. Implies they could subpoena 3d parties for your emails. Whether they could subpoena you for the emails you recvd from others is also at risk. Once there is such a subpoena a privilege log would be prepared to exempt all a/c emails. I would not use the case to subpoena others - instead the case conflicts with other cases and should be fought Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. Original message from Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>: what does that meant in civil cases. all emails discoverable? On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Martin Weinberg < > wrote: Confirming that the OK is to the "alternative version" which I prefer (its milder in tone but memorializes our positions) Wanda is ready to email in morning (Roy still in NY) I will coordinate Larry's availability for 4-26 thru Scott since Roy ma remain in NY Available in morning on cell in case you want to talk re next steps re I (or any other matters) PS 11th Circuit issued a very bad decision on emails, holding that 4th Am privacy is non-existence once the email is sent (in the face of a Supreme Court case from 1880s which retained privacy in a letter once sent except of course from the receiver). We of course rely on the any-client privilege for legal electronic communications. Take care re non-privileged emails since the C/Appeals decision may embolden law enforcement