From: Valerie Post AIMI=I> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Re: Re: Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:47:22 +0000 Hmmmmm. The road to hell is paved with good intentions? Always check your intentions for motives. From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Valerie Post Sent: Mon Nov 01 06:41:16 2010 Subject: Re: Re: Re: THat is a slippery slope. good intentions are usually behind most wars. each side believing their intentions are honorable. Good intentions assumes you have a right to insert your intentions into someone elses sphere. Are you really aware of your true intentions. ? or do you mask them even to yourself. ? , best posssible outcome for all?.. what if you are on a different team.? does the all include the other side?.. Is it in their interest to lose the game.? are they not part of the " all ". or is it only your team On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Valerie Post -"Ma> wrote: Going back to the science of communication, its not manipulation if you truly believe that whatever you are proposing will lead to the best possible outcome for all those involved. That's the only way I do business and I assume that's the same for you. Having good intentions is what's important in life, we are not always responsible for outcomes. From: Jeevacation <jeen@g t cati mail.opm> To: Valerie Post Sent: Thu Oct 21 14:24:08 2010 Subject: Re: Re: Re: What did you find most interesting Sony for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Oct 21, 2010, at 1:58 PM, Valerie Post c wrote: Caesar From: Jeevacation <[email protected]> To: Valerie Post Sent: Thu Oct 21 13:16:18 2010 Subject: Re: Re: Polanski? Sony for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Oct 21, 2010, at 11:42 AM, Valerie Post c wrote: Like you sometimes sound Roman? EFTA00754020