From: "Al seckel" To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:02:39 +0000 Hope you enjoyed last night's conversation. It seemed like you did, and you enjoy the passionate exchange of interesting ideas at he forefront, which has made my own life so rich for so many years... In my physics day, I was particularly interested in Murray and Jim's work in revisiting qm. and the many worlds interpretation, and at the time (this is back in the 80s), I thought it was the most promising and exciting line in physics. (At the time I didn't like string theory, which was all in that horrible light cone gauge (1984-1988), and so, it became difficult for me to see the actual physics, and so I didn't have a feel for it. I also had other objections at the time, such as lack of connection with experiment, etc. Then, I got leukemia, and dropped out of physics and the world for a few years). Anyway, I have an incredible amount of respect and admiration for both Jim and Murray. Jim is absolutely first rate in my book. Unfortunately, their path has not made as much progress as I had hoped it would. I know that Murray got distracted with other things, and I need o catch up with Jim, as it has been a while. Would you still like to put together a fun group? Love to work with you on this.. your devoted friend cheers, me From: Jeffrey E in <*[email protected]> To: Al seckel < > Sent: Mon, June 28, 2010 5:24:05 AM Subject: murray gell-mans work. follows :: seems to fit with seans... also for sean its nabokov . "speak memory" ( TIME) Continuing work with Jim Hartle on understanding how to view quantum mechanics. The usual description is rather silly, and besides it doesn't really allow for quantum cosmology. We have a much better formulation. Work with two theorists in Vienna on unconventional formulae for entropy. It turns out that the usual expression for entropy or information applies only to certain problems, while othe