From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: roger schank Subject: Re: beating a dead horse Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:10:29 +0000 roger„ we will have to agree to disagree... The objective measure is easy.. He hasn't really been sucessful in his goals. , he focuses on the wrong questions . you are convincing me , he is a dolt. not the reverse, you have yet to give me a concrete example of his success. the selling of ships versus operating„ turns out to be the nursey rhymes of greeks.. every kid knows it. you and i didn't , so what.? , detecting errors on a ship, will only bring expenses down with a probability , spend too much time worrying about bupkis, fixing things that don't yet need fixing.. You can bring up your computer speed, browser efficiency, better screen resolution, all adding up to a big so what? . I want you to focus on what you do best. you ideas on what children need to know . is 100%... the shipping thing though it might bring you income for a very limited amount of time , is doomed. On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 7:47 AM, roger schank < wrote: spoken like someone who has never advised PhD students; it is a beginning, not an end; because you can think faster and deeper than he does proves nothing but there is a point here you are not getting which is the how; you have to set up the right question to find answers; if you want a smart SI system that detects errors on a ship you need to work out the details of the how which is what he is doing and my lower level of acceptance of intelligence that you cite comes not from softball, since I dont talk to those people, (who could?) but from graduate students I had over 35 years who are nowhere near as smart as dimitri roger schank http://www.rogerschank.com/ On Oct 31, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Jeffrey Epstein wrote: You have lost your mind„ , this is total bullshit.. goals are not one dimensional. actor goals specifically, the captain might want money, promotion, bribe, sleep . respect, ..