From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 02:58:50 +0000 I am not even thinking of litigation yet. I have plenty of time. Marty , its wrong, we knew something was amiss. Brad continues to make trouble. and my guess it is with a back door from critten. its not nice On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Martin Weinberg < wrote: See below The basic rule - should be reviewed by Fla civil atty - is that a suit against an attorney permits the attorney to use privileged info in self-defense The corollary - the attorney would be limited in his reliance on confidential information to that necessary to defend his position therefore the scope of waiver is related to the scope of the lawsuit For instance - if your complaint was about a specific representation, a good argument could be made (again, the precedents need very careful checking - matter of state law) that the only confidential information that could be disclosed would be that which directly related to any decision, judgment in that specific case or any information that rebutted a claim of prejudice or damage So go slowly, assess the upside, and then the downside of any litigation Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 ell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, EFTA00732494