Jay P. Lelkowitz, P.C. a To Call Writer Directly: June 17, 2009 VIA FACSIMILE Ms. A. Marie Villafana, Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Marie: Wel write prepared this answer in response to your letter dated June 15, 2009. At this point, as you are well aware it has been well-eyee-twe-yeeesalmost three years since the federal government first intervened in what was originally a matter investigated and charged by state prosecutorial authorities. It has been almost a year since Mr. Epstein pleaded guilty in state court and began serving his sentence in county jail, pursuant to the terms and as a direct result of the federal Non-Prosecution Agreement (the "NPA"). When Mr. Epstein was sentenced, the U.S. Attorney promised me and my co-counsel that the United States Attorney's Office's involvement would cease with Mr. Epstein's execution of the NPA and incarceration in state custody.—Mest importantly; Wwe were also promised that the federal government would not intervene in discretionary state or county decisions regarding the implementation of Mr. Epstein's sentence. We3Aze—_take this opportunity to address in detail each of the alleged instances you describe to support your eententien—position that Mr. Epstein has engaged in a pattern of breaching the NPA. We respectfully submit (and support through documentary evidence) that Mr. Epstein has done nothing to breach the NPA and that the allegations that he has breached the NPA are either factually or legally effeneensincorrect. Mr. Epstein's overriding commitment intent is to complete his jail sentence, fulfill his other obligations under the NPA, and reach final settlements of pending section 2255 cases with plaintiffs who are agreeable to such settlements. There have been no past breaches of the NPA. There have been no "willful" breaches of the NPA. There has be