Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 414 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/18/2009 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / Related cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 / ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant Epstein's Emergency Motion for Order of the Preservation of Evidence (D.E. #405). By this Motion, Epstein moves for an order requiring Herbert Stettin, the State Court appointed receiver ("Receiver") and Chief Restructuring Officer ("CRO") of the Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, P.A. ("RRA") law firm, to preserve all evidence relevant to the investment scheme referenced in the Motion and further prohibit the individuals at the RRA Law Firm from tampering, destroying or altering any such evidence.' In his response to the Motion, ' The Motion also sought to have the order apply and be directed to "Bradley J. Edwards, a 'partner' in [RRA and] Stuart Rosenfeldt as partner/shareholder and receiver of RRA" (Deis Emer. Mtn., p.1). However, on November 11, 2009, a resolution was entered appointing Stettin as the CRO of RRA and delegating to him all operational and managerial control over RRA. This Resolution effectively removed Rosenfeldt from all managerial roles at RRA, and to the extent Edwards had any managerial roles, EFTA00728687