Dear Jeff We have taken to heart your suggestion of erring on the side of caution. As I have previously stated, Mr. Epstein is committed to honoring each and every one of his obligations under the Non-Prosecution Agreement (the "NPA"). As you are aware, Mr. Epstein is currently serving the community control portion of his sentence .We have requested the transfer of the supervision from the State of Florida to the state of his residence i.e. the Virgin Islands. I write you prior to his final acceptance of the approved transfer in order to confirm that you would not consider this action as a violation of our agreement. All transfers of supervision are administered under the Interstate Compact for Transfer of Adult Supervision ("ICAOS"). The ICAOS , as you may already be aware, is an agreement, to which all fifty states, Puerto Rico, and the United States Virgin Islands are signatories and by which they are all legally bound. It carries with it the weight of federal law. In fact, any state law that may conflict with the ICAOS is actually superseded by it With regard the transfer of supervision, the position of the ICAOS is clear, that is , if an offender requests, and the state which imposed the sentence (the "Sending State", in this case Florida ) agrees, to transfer the offender's supervision to the place of his primary residence, the state receiving the transfer request (the "Receiving State", U.S.V.I. ) is generally obligated to accept that transfer. The ICAOS policy dictates that the Receiving State is barred in most circumstances from rejecting the transfer request.. In those cases where the offender is subject to enhanced restrictions, the offender still may apply for transfer, however, because of the additional manpower burden and the considerable expense associated with the enhanced restrictions,( in Mr Epsteins case, community control ) the Receiving State had the right to deny the transfer request Mr. Epstein has made a request to t