Froi > To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:11:00 +0000 Importance Normal I am very sorry and I want to apologize if I was rude or disrespectful, I did not ment to be. I just always get negative feed-back from you that I am wrong, bad and not good enough. Maybe you will say I am not listening but listening to what - bad bad bad wrong wrong wrong?? Any concrete corrections? Making me think, ok, but how? If bliss is not complete/perfect happiness, so what is it? Of course I can be wrong, I know that I don't know, why would I ask if I would know? What do you expect? Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 13:06:50 -0400 Subject: Re: From: [email protected] To: it is always easy to come to erroneious condusions when your definitions are fraught with errors. bliss is not complete happiness. where did you find that bourgoiuis definiton.. candy is not sugar. , you are trying too hard to be right, and slipping on a banana peel of the common On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:07 P I took some time to overthink your messages: > wrote: So first you say your best student achieved bliss which is by definition complete happiness, isn't it? Then you say something that makes one happy - happiness - is cheap like sweet candy and not good enough as it does not get one thinking, don't you? But then you state that everything is like candy, which by definition is out of sugar, which is sweet, even if there exist different variations of candy. So the achievement of your best student is also like candy - isn't it? - which is not good enough and therefore not really an achievement, or is it? So what gets one thinking if everything is like candy? Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 07:07:42 -0400 Subject: Re: From: [email protected] To: You are having way too much candy. You want more and more as you get bored by the taste easier and faster, it is a vicious circle. this is not a question , it is a conclusion. and a waste of your time On Thu, Sep