From: Jeevacation <jeevacation®gmail.com> To: Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:13:41 +0000 If Marie declared a breach he would have no waiver ,it would put us on the same side wanting no frivolous breach declared Sent from my iPhone On Oct 2, 2009, at 7:49 PM, "Martin Weinberg" < > wrote: meant "sound & logical to him" - Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 ell This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, M., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. ------- Forwarded Message: From: "Martin Weinberg" ,< To: Jeffrey Epstein Cc: "Weinberg, Martin" Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:23:20 +0000 You could try but why would he drop the pending cases, stop litigation, etc, and take the risk that if you breached, he would lose the settlement?? He would feel he has no control in addition to losing the value of immediacy. If there is some condition within his control that the delay alone was predicated upon i.e. you want the escrow to guarantee his performance of x term then at least the proposal would have a sound and logical basis. Don't risk the settlement unless he agrees. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 EFTA00702503