From: Jeffrey epstein <[email protected]> To: ' Subject: Re: SDR Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:55:11 +0000 Number Sony for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Feb 24, 2011, at 3:50 PM, wrote: PS: I am heading to McDonalds right now but I should be free till about 1:30PST. Original Message From: Jeffrey E stein <jeevacation©gmail.com> To: Melanie < > Sent: Thu, Feb 24, 2011 4:30 am Subject: Re: SDR the imf has written some good papers on sdrs.? On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Melanie wrote: We can't even make our email work, haha. Interesting idea let me think some more. From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:08 PM To: Subject: Re: SDR correct. another competing sdr, could have fixed value„ transpamcy, as it would all be done by the gates computers. On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:07 PM, ‹ > wrote: Pumpkin, there seem to be really only 4 things you can do with SDR (beyond what's happening now): • Turn them into a privately held asset • Make them the world currency • Increase their supply • Decrease their supply The second idea seems not great. But the first, could be interesting if you think about why (and who) wants to acquire SDR. Perhaps impose them as a tax for doing business in a country or trading with them? Increasing their supply seems to be happening now with an increasing US deficit but soon that might cause implosion. Not sure what happens limiting their supply since that's never been tried but maybe the better way to limit their supply is to form another competing SDR. So instead of allowing the jokers at the IMF to pick the basket of currencies or issuance conditions, you find another entity. Like the Gates Foundation. (T) Or maybe you penalize in SDR or forgive debt not with clever accounting but with SDR? EFTA00696657