From: Daniel Sabba •t: > To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: (BV) Goldman Calls JPMorgan Too Big, Not Too Big to Fail: Matt L Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 01:57:24 +0000 Importance: Normal Classification: Public good article. Original Message From: "Daniel Sabba (DEUTSCHE BANK SECURI)" [ M=1 Sent: 01/06/2015 12:53 AM GMT To: undisclosed-recipients: Subject: (BV) Goldman Calls JPMorgan Too Big, Not Too Big to Fail: Matt L (BV) Goldman Calls JPMorgan Too Big, Not Too Big to Fail: Matt L evine This has been prepared solely for informational purposes. It is not an offer, recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell, nor is it an official confirmation of terms. It is based on information generally available to the public from sources believed to be reliable. No representation is made that it is accurate or complete or that any returns indicated will be achieved. Changes to assumptions may have a material impact on any returns detailed. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. Price and availability are subject to change without notice. Additional information is available upon request. Goldman Calls JPMorgan Too Big, Not Too Big to Fail: Matt Levine 2015-01-05 23:12:57.831 GMT By Matt Levine (Bloomberg View) -- Goldman Sachs made some news today by publishing an equity research note arguing that JPMorgan should be broken into some number of pieces that is not one. This is a popular theme among bank analysts, and bank critics, and some bank shareholders, and really a whole lot of people who are not bank executives. Goldman's particular idea -- in a note by Richard Ramsden, Conor Fitzgerald, Daniel Paris and Kevin Senet -- is a pretty standard, Glass-Steagall-ish version of the proposal, in which JPMorgan would split into a "traditional" bank (loans, branches, credit cards) and an "institutional" bank (investment banking, asset management, etc.). Call them New Chase (traditional) and New JPMorgan (instituti