From: "Martin Weinberg" To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <jeevacationggmail.com> Cc: <j Subject: Re: JE Appeal Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:37:44 +0000 i will talk to jay and fowler to make sure we can do a filing that gets you some advantage - allows judge to see scarola as something other than a source of legal wisdom Original Message From: Jeffrey Epstein To: Martin Weinberg Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:02 PM Subject: Re: JE Appeal i am ok if you want to make a motion for sanctions or some such „ it is wrong. On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Martin Weinberg C > wrote: I am not content to simply sit silent while Scarola writes threatening letters but I do not want to do anything in conflict with strategy to bring Kirkland in etc. but think that the Judge should know at the appropriate time that Scarola is threatening your counsel to try to deny you representation when its Scarola's intransigence/irrationality on the counter-claim that keeps the case alive. If Scarola was to have your way, you would have no lawyers to defend you on the counter-claim. Original Message From: Jeffrey Epstein To: Sandra Musumeci Cc: Jay Lefkowitz • Martin Weinberg • • Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 7:28 PM Subject: Re: JE Appeal can i also have the appeal iteself On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Sandra Musumeci • wrote: Team, Attached are the file-stamped copies of the Notice of Time Requested for Oral Argument and letter to the Clerk of the Court regarding scheduling issues, both of which were filed in court and served on the DA today in connection with the appeal of the SORA adjudication. I will let you know when we are notified of an oral argument date. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. Regards, Sandy Sandra L. Musumeci I Kirkland & Ellis LLP 601 Lexington Avenue I New York. NY 10022 ***************WW***WW***WW***WW***WW***WW***WW************ The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privi