From: David Grosof To: jeffrey epstein [email protected]> Subject: Re: Your Special Day Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 12:26:05 +0000 can't resist! Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone. On Jan 20, 2017 4:14 AM, "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> wrote: probablity and statistics gets its strengh from the law of large numbers . centrifigal force is a pseudo force but not distinguishable in the right frame. . like gravity. lets assume that there is a force pushing heads and tails towards a 50 50 distribution. . not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would . could be a force similar to the EM one. On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 AM, David Grosof > wrote: Cool. And the former question, of clarification? Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone. On Jan 20, 2017 4:10 AM, "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> wrote: pretty well On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM, David Grosof < > wrote: Probability as a force rather than a what? Didn't suss out the next word... Watson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk —4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion. Know him well? D. Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone. On Jan 20, 2017 2:47 AM, "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> wrote: 1. is probability a force rather than a markter. if you look at a bell curve from scratch, it looks as if it under a force pushing things towards the center. i think gravity might be just that . 2. all signals in nature need to be envvyrpted so that the enemy cannot read. this includes inner signals that if you are aware of , can give you up to your predator. so signals from the nose , my conjecture is that each person has its own enxruption de encyption algorithm built in. fyi having dinnner with Jin Watson. On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:28 AM, David Grosof > wrote: At 10:13 PM 01/19/17, you wrote: al