From: Vahe Stepanian .41 To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com> CC: Paul Morris , Daniel Sabba , Ariane Dwyer , Richard Kahn Subject: RE: DB James Malcolm: Are the BoJ shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality [C] Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 14:00:19 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.gif Classification: Confidential Jeffrey- please find risk reversal pricing below per your request. Spot ref = 120.15 #1) SFLLC sells Put, buys Call on USD/JPY in a premium neutral Risk Reversal Put Strike: 118.00 Call Strike: 122.45 Notional: USD 10,000,000 USD Expiry: Thu 06-Aug-2015 (3m) Structure Mid: USD -113,000 #2) SFLLC sells Put, buys Call on USD/JPY in a premium neutral Risk Reversal Put Strike: 117.00 Call Strike: 123.45 Notional: USD 10,000,000 USD Expiry: Thu 05-Nov-2015 (6m) Structure Mid: USD -160,000 #3) SFLLC sells Put, buys Call on USD/JPY in a premium neutral Risk Reversal Put Strike: 116.00 Call Strike: 125.00 Notional: USD 10,000,000 USD Expiry: Thu 05-Nov-2015 (6m) Structure Mid: USD -130,000 Thank you, Vahe From: Daniel Sabba Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 4:35 PM To: Jeffrey E.; Paul Morris Cc: Vahe Stepanian; Mane Dwyer; Richard Kahn Subject: RE: DB James Malcolm: Are the Bo) shifting stance? Own some cheap optionality [C] Classification: Confidential The reason why one would do the trade below is for its embedded leverage. While it requires upfront premium, there is no IA required besides it. A premium neutral risk reversal utilizes your capital as it requires Initial Amount under your Credit Support Annex terms. EFTA00639961