LETTER TO Consider CC to Hon Kenneth Marra US Attorney Wilfredo Ferrer Re Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v United States Case No 08-80736-Civ- Marra Dear.. and MEM Late on December 30, 2014, the petitioners lawyers Bradley J Edwards and Paul Cassell filed a Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action, Dkt 279, which was later replaced by a similar corrected pleading Dkt 280. The Motion was ostensibly to add parties to a lawsuit that has been pending for over 6 years. As to the request as to Jane Doe #3, it comes more than 5 years after she was aware of the NPA having relied upon its provisions to sue Jeffrey Epstein as Jane Doe 102, and at least 3 years 8 months after she was provably in communication with Mr. Edwards and providing him statements about Mr. Epstein. As the case is between the Government and the Petitioners with Mr. Epstein as only a limited Intervenor and as the allegations raised as to me by the Motion are not material to the resolution of whether the CVRA was or was not violated and what an appropriate remedy would be, and because the allegations are defamatory, incontrovertibly untrue, uncorroborated, gratuitously included and malicious, I request that you move to strike them from the record of these proceedings. First, I never had any sexual contact with Jane Doe #3 as alleged, not in West Palm Beach, not in New Mexico, not in the US Virgin Islands, not on a private airplane, not anywhere. I do not recall ever being in her presence and can certainly attest under oath that I never had sexual contact of any kind with her. I have never had a massage from any under age female at any Epstein residence, I have never had a massage on a private airplane, I have only been to his New Mexico residence on one occasion, with my daughter and wife who were with me at all times, I have only been to his US Virgin Islands residence with my wife who was with me at all times, and the entirety of the allegations are demonstrably untrue