First and foremost, the battle was longer and hard fought.. excesses were were engaged in by both sides, and with the benefit perfect hindsight, I should have stopped the reaching into the personal life of Jeffrey Sloman.. Having never been in such a situation ,I frankly, chose to follow the strong advice of my attorneys, but should have known better. I would like to personally apologize to jeff.. He knows the true identities of the culprits, and I have already been punished for some of their sins. They were pushing hard for the inclusion of the daughters info.,and fact wanted to go much further I objected, but was overruled. Dershowitz, was also adamant in its inclusion. As he was flailing around for an explanation to the extraordinary animosity and tactics he felt were being used. 1. First. The NPA was heavily lawyered and negotiated over many months. There were amendments and clarifications before the plea date of jan 04. As in all pleas the rule of contracts apply. And in fact the law is clear that if an ambiguity existis , which in this case there is none , the court must interpret it against the government. In our agreement„ the judge was required to agree to a certain plea. She did WORD FOR WORD. The language that marie refers to, Imprisonment versus , jail sentence, which she wanted to add a few days before the plea, is a distinction without a difference. In the ordinary course of state pleas the phrase imprisonment is used interchangeably, with the phrase jail sentence the latter usually reserved for a county incarceration. However we enclose the statues that regulate state INPRISONMENT , and it is clear that work release is a program authorized for all inmates. The nunc pro tunc order that is quoted in the letter, is simply the judge entering the order for the agreed community control portion of the sentence that was imposed exactly as per the NPA dictated. It is imposed at the end of the incarcerative portion of the sentence. The s