IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 EDWARDS, et al., Plaintiffs / Counterclaim Defendants, v. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff. DEFENDANT / COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN DERSHOWITZ'S MEMROANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE NO. 3'S MOTION TO OUASH OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff Alan Dershowitz ("Dershowitz") respectfully submits this Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion to Quash or for Protective Order Regarding Subpoena filed by non-party Jane Doe No. 3 (the "Motion to Quash"). INTRODUCTION The Motion to Quash presents Jane Doe No. 3 as though she were a minor who is being unwillingly dragged into a dispute not of her making and who would prefer to avoid public attention.' Nothing could be further from the truth. This case began when Jane Doe No. 3 and her lawyers, Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") and Paul G. Cassell ("Cassell"), made a deliberate decision to file a pleading in a federal lawsuit accusing Dershowitz of committing a heinous crime: sexually abusing a minor. Jane Doe No. 3 I Jane Doe No. 3 has no right to proceed anonymously as she has been identified publicly on several occasions and has made public statements using her own name, as indicated by the exhibits that she submitted with the Motion to Quash. See Motion to Quash, Ex. 1-4. Nonetheless, Dershowitz will use "Jane Doe No. 3" to refer to her until the Court orders otherwise. EFTA00584062