IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG v. BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, et al., Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. JUDGE: HAFELE JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO BRADLEY EDWARDS'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO STRIKE THE JUNE 30.2017 AFFIDAVIT OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AS TO WHICU DISCOVERY WAS WITHHELD UNDER CLAIMS OF PRIVILEGE Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files his Response to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's ("Edwards") Motion in Limine to Strike the June 30, 2017 affidavit of Jeffrey Epstein,' which was filed in support of the undisputed facts as recited in his Motion for Summary Judgment, and to "exclude evidence as to which discovery was withheld under claims of privilege." As demonstrated more fully below, Edwards's Motion is deficient on its face, and in direct contravention to the facts. As such, Edwards's Motion should be denied. INTRODUCTION Epstein filed his Motion for Summary Judgment on June 30, 2017, and in support thereof executed an affidavit, which was nearly identical to the one he executed in support of his previously filed Motion for Summary Judgment in 2012. In this affidavit, Epstein delineates the undisputed facts upon which he relied in filing suit against Edwards. A true and correct copy of I While the Court denied as moot the striking of the affidavit as to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment for purposes of the Summary Judgment hearing, the issues raised in the Motion are still addressed herein. EFTA00582821