From: J To: Subject: Re: thoughts Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:38:30 +0000 thx On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 7:18 AM > wrote: Conference call with Kathy Ruemmler, Michael Wolff and Darren at 11:30am today. I will send dial in details to all. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 2, 2018, at 9:21 PM, J < > wrote: Forwarded message From: Kathy Ruemmler Date: Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 9:07 PM Subject: Re: thoughts To: Michael Wolff Cc: J , Darren Indyke J, Please have put a call/meeting together tomorrow so we can discuss collectively. Michael is correct that this should not be done piecemeal. K. On Dec 2, 2018, at 9:02 PM, Michael Wolff < > wrote: You're thinking of the investigative journalist as having a higher purpose instead of being a player in a greater drama. Your enemies have supplied them with value. So the issue is what you can offer them. Let's chat tomorrow. On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 8:51 PM J > wrote: If the investigative journalist would take a break from patting each other on the back, they might want to explain to the public. how many other men received erotic massages from these girls . how many worked in the local strip clubs BEFORE they met mr epstein. how many worked in the local erotic massage parlors. how many advertised as prostitutes . They might want to disclose that the former detective in the video worked for the lawyers not the police. They might feel an obligation to point out that some of these girls brought their best friends both to mr epstein and to other men they might want to also point out that the idea that mr epstein was an informant. has absolutely no foundation in fact whatsoever. ask for one iota of proof. IT DOES "NOT exist. The so called investigative reporters total malicious fabrication.. Mr epstein was an investor that lost money, nothing more. EFTA00486084