From: Brad Edwards To: Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:58:29 +0000 I am available between 2 and 3 today. Sent via BlackBerty by AT&T From: Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 08:42:50 -0400 To: Brad Edwards< Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Hello Brad. Jeffrey is asking if he may speak with you? Please let me know. Thanks, Sent from my iPhone On Aug 3, 2011, at 10:16 PM, Brad Edwards < > wrote: Please pass this along to Mr. Epstein. CONFIDENTIAL - FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES ONLY Again, I agree that our previous discussions were productive. Or at least could have been.... You expressed that you wanted to resolve both cases — (1) my case and (2) the CVRA. You suggested a binding arbitration with a high/low component on my case, and we discussed me putting together a proposal for resolving the CVRA case after I spoke with my clients. I immediately attempted to put your ideas in motion, but you apparently rejected the idea for the high/low agreement that you proposed. So I stopped preparing the proposal on the CVRA case because it appeared I was wasting my time. As for the "insertion of my attorney", maybe I was not clear enough on the phone, so I will say this as plainly as I can so that there is no confusion. Discussions regarding my case cannot be linked to the resolution of the CVRA case for obvious ethical reasons. That is why I turned over the finalizing of the settlement on my case to Jack Scarola. To be absolutely sure the separate negotiations are not inappropriately intertwined, I have given Jack complete discretion to resolve the abuse of process claim on terms that I consider to be reasonable and based upon the discussions that you and I have already had. If it is the uncertainty of the proposal regarding the CVRA case that caused you to delay these negotiations by refusing to accept the terms related to the resolution of my case, then I will try to clear that up. As you know, you are not a party to the CVRA case. That case is