Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida Re: Protecting the Rights of Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Dear First, as mentioned before, please feel free to call me "Paul" rather than "Judge Cassell." Brad Edwards and I hope to build a close and friendly working relationship with you as we proceed with our efforts to protect victims' rights. Also, if ou copy Brad on our e-mails, that would be helpful at our end. (Do you want me to "cc" MI?). On behalf of Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), I am writing to respond to the e-mail you sent to me yesterday. I am happy to hear that the Government will now agree with factual assertions that we present if they are correct. Attached along with this letter is a draft statement of facts section that the victims are in the process of preparing to file with the Court on October 27, 2010. The victims of course request your agreement to all of the facts presented there, as they obviously believe that they are all correct. If you believe that any of the facts they propose are incorrect, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 would reiterate their long-standing request that you work with us to arrive at a mutually- agreed statement of facts. As you know, in the summer of 2008 Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 were working with you on a stipulation of facts when you reversed course and took that position that no recitation of the facts was necessary (see doc. #19 at 2). In particular, on July 29, 2008, you filed a Notice to Court Regarding Absence of Need for Evidentiary Hearing (doc. #17). At that time, you took the position that, because no federal criminal charges had been filed in the Southern District of Florida, no additional evidence was required to decide the victims' petition that was before the Court. I hope that your e-mail means that you will at least look at our facts and propose any modifications that you deem appropriate. Having that evidence