Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 90-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2009 Pag Vit JANE DOE NO. 2, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINITFF'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES Plaintiff, JANE DOE 2, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 33, hereby resRonds toptefendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff as fo4oWs: General Objections 1. Plaintiff objects to Defendants Interrogatories to the extent that the Interrogatories call for the disclosure of information protected by the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other applicable privilege or immunity, whether created by statute or common law. Plaintiff claims such privileges and protections to the extent implicated by each Interrogatory, and excludes privileged and protected information from any responses to Defendant's discovery. Any disclosure is inadvertent and is not intended to waive those privileges or protections, which are specifically reserved. 2. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that same are vague, ambiguous, incomprehensible and/or overly broad. " A I V EFTA00221751