Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 67-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2009 PggigleQff bf 8 703 So.2d 1076 703 So.2d 1076.22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375.23 Fla. L. Weekly D169 (Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. Kimberly BALAS and Teresa Shumate, Petitioners, v. Marjorie A. RUZZO, and Exec., Inc., etc., Re- spondents. No. 97-82. Page 1 307Ak31 k. Relevancy and Materiality. Most Cited Cases Party may be permitted to discover evidence that would be inadmissible at trial, if it would lead to discovery of relevant evidence. West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(6)(1). (3) Pretrial Procedure WA 4:=36.1 Oct. 10, 1997. As Mortified on Grant of Clarification Jan. 2, 1998. 307A Pretrial Procedure reY. der.‘e ?" s Se..7-ck 251(o t• 307All Depositions and Discovery Plaintiffs brought action against alleged house of %ann. 307A11(A) Discovery in General prostitution for, inter alia, coercion of prostitution. 307Ak36 Particular Subjects of Disclos ure - The Circuit Court, Brevard County. Frank Pound, 307Ak36.1 k. In General. Most Cited J., granted in part defendants' motion to compel dis- covery. Plaintiffs filed petition for writ of certior- ari. The District Court of Appeal, W. Sharp, .1., held that evidence of plaintiffs' past prostitution and their revenues relating to such activities was dis- coverable. Petition denied. Harris, J., concurred specially and filed opinion. West Headnotes (I) Pretrial Procedure 307A rii:=D31 307A Pretrial Procedure 307All Depositions and Discovery 307A11(A) Discovery in General 307Ak31 k. Relevancy and Materiality. Most Cited Cases Discovery in civil cases must be relevant to subject matter of case and must be admissible or reason- ably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(bX1). [2) Pretrial Procedure 307A te=031 307A Pretrial Procedure 307A11 Depositions and Discovery 307A11(A) Discovery in General Cases Evidence of plaintiffs past prost