From: To: Jay Lefkowitz Subject: RE: Reply Brief in Jane Does I. United States Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:08:37 +0000 Importance: Normal When (if) this is ever all over, I will buy you a cup of coffee and we can swap stories. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: Jay Lefkowitz Sent: Thursda October 16, 2008 5:01 PM To: USAFLS • Ro Black Cc Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does United States Thank welcome to the club. I often wish plaintiffs would sue someone else instead of my client. :) Frog Sent: 10/16/2008 04:23 PM AST To: Jay Lefkowitz; "Roy BLACK" - Cc: ' Subject: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States Dear Roy and Jay: I am attaching the reply brief filed by Brad Edwards with two pieces of correspondence that he attached to his pleading as exhibits. I had not seen Mr. Edwards' October 15th letter before he filed it in connection with his Reply, so I do not know whether Mr. Lee has even received it yet. Mr. Edwards argues that Mr. Epstein has no interest in keeping the agreement confidential because he has not responded to Mr. Edwards' motion to unseal. As you know, in our Response, the United States argued that this issue should be litigated in one of the suits filed by Mr. Edwards against Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards apparently believes it is to his benefit to argue these issues, instead, in his lawsuit against the United States. «DE30_081016_Reply re Motn Unseal.pdf» «DE30-2_081016_Ex 1.pdf» «DE30-3_081016_Ex 2.pdf» Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00211806